Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXCPX vs PACAX
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MXCPX vs PACAX
Empower Conservative Profile I
Price$7.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.92M
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCPX vs. PACAX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCPX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. PACAX (569M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MXCPX: PACAX (3.25) vs MXCPX (3.06). MXCPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MXCPX (26 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than MXCPX (0.85). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. MXCPX (26.00). MXCPX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.42 vs. MXCPX (5.50). MXCPX return over 5 years is better than : 12.99 vs. PACAX (11.65).
| MXCPX | PACAX | MXCPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.00 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.043 | 4.776 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 569M | 248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.06 | 3.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.50 | 6.42 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.03 | 19.24 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.99 | 11.65 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.28 | 22.84 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers