Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXCPX vs PACAX
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MXCPX vs PACAX
Empower Conservative Profile I
Price$7.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.37M
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCPX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCPX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. PACAX (580M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MXCPX: PACAX (3.40) vs MXCPX (2.96). MXCPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MXCPX (26 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than MXCPX (0.85). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. MXCPX (26.00). MXCPX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.85 vs. MXCPX (5.06). PACAX (12.22) and MXCPX (11.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MXCPX | PACAX | MXCPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.00 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.766 | 9.155 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 580M | 258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 3.40 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.06 | 5.85 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.53 | 24.62 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.74 | 12.22 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.23 | 29.82 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement