Ad is loading...
MXCPX vs PACAX
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MXCPX vs PACAX
Empower Conservative Profile I
Price$7.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.67
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.91M
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCPX vs. PACAX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCPX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. PACAX (562M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MXCPX: PACAX (3.51) vs MXCPX (3.10). MXCPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MXCPX (26 years) vs PACAX (31 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than MXCPX (0.85). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. MXCPX (26.00). MXCPX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.74 vs. MXCPX (4.28). MXCPX return over 5 years is better than : 15.53 vs. PACAX (11.75).
| MXCPX | PACAX | MXCPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.00 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.00 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.156 | 1.725 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 562M | 243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 3.51 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | 5.74 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.55 | 12.44 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.53 | 11.75 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.40 | 17.44 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers