Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXCPX vs PACAX
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MXCPX vs PACAX
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCPX vs. PACAX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCPX is a Hold and PACAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. PACAX (847M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MXCPX: PACAX (3.05) vs MXCPX (2.55). MXCPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MXCPX (27 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than MXCPX (0.84). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. MXCPX (9.00). MXCPX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.47 vs. MXCPX (8.41). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.63 vs. MXCPX (7.08).
| MXCPX | PACAX | MXCPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.96 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.96 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.124 | 3.962 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 847M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 3.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.41 | 10.47 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.87 | 21.05 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.08 | 10.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.58 | 39.97 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers