Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXCPX vs PACAX
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts MXCPX vs PACAX
MXCPX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXCPX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXCPX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXCPX has more cash in the bank: 1.83B vs. PACAX (850M). PACAX pays higher dividends than MXCPX: PACAX (2.74) vs MXCPX (2.54). MXCPX was incepted earlier than PACAX: MXCPX (27 years) vs PACAX (33 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than MXCPX (0.84). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. MXCPX (9.00). MXCPX (0) and PACAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. MXCPX (6.16). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.99 vs. MXCPX (5.82).
| MXCPX | PACAX | MXCPX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.96 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.96 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.897 | 4.378 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 850M | 216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 2.74 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 6.60 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.24 | 30.38 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.82 | 7.99 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.28 | 37.11 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers