Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXGSX vs RGACX
MXGSX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts MXGSX vs RGACX
MXGSX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXGSX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXGSX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MXGSX (2.34B). MXGSX pays higher dividends than RGACX: MXGSX (0.06) vs RGACX (0.00). MXGSX was incepted earlier than RGACX: MXGSX (11 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than MXGSX (0.61). MXGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). MXGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: MXGSX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. MXGSX (6.88). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. MXGSX (7.22).
| MXGSX | RGACX | MXGSX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.405 | 6.185 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 7.94 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 43.05 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.22 | 13.23 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.34 | 107.97 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement