Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MXGSX vs RGAGX
MXGSX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts MXGSX vs RGAGX
MXGSX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MXGSX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MXGSX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MXGSX (2.37B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than MXGSX: RGAGX (0.51) vs MXGSX (0.06). MXGSX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: MXGSX (11 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). MXGSX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). MXGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). MXGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: MXGSX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. MXGSX (7.81). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.14 vs. MXGSX (11.83).
| MXGSX | RGAGX | MXGSX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.29 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.29 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.061 | 10.599 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.51 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | 15.41 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.45 | 55.31 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.83 | 27.14 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.45 | 117.06 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers