Compare predictions HLF vs MYO
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLF is a Hold and MYO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMYO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MYO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MYO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- MYO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +11.79% price change this week, while MYO (@Medical Specialties) price change was +26.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
HLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.
MYO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.09% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
@Medical Specialties (+3.48% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| HLF | MYO | HLF / MYO | |
| Capitalization | 1B | 93.2M | 1,076% |
| EBITDA | 482M | -7.71M | -6,248% |
| Gain YTD | -39.712 | -31.337 | 127% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.42 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.06B | 19.2M | 26,365% |
| Total Cash | 575M | 8.87M | 6,485% |
| Total Debt | 2.77B | 601K | 460,732% |
HLF | MYO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MYO's Valuation (56) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as HLF (58) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MYO’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
MYO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MYO’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (7) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MYO (98) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MYO’s over the last 12 months.
MYO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Medical Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (82) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MYO’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MYO (100) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MYO’s over the last 12 months.
| HLF | MYO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PIEIX | 25.11 | 0.22 | +0.88% |
| Principal Glb Emerging Markets Inst | |||
| INDCX | 11.62 | 0.02 | +0.17% |
| Pioneer Disciplined Growth C | |||
| SFMRX | 36.23 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R6 | |||
| WFMIX | 48.15 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Inst | |||
| PSPFX | 3.96 | -0.01 | -0.25% |
| US Global Investors Global Res | |||
HLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with CENTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then CENTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| CENTA - HLF | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| USNA - HLF | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| CENT - HLF | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| BGS - HLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| DAR - HLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||
MYO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MYO and CERS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MYO and CERS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO | 100% | -2.82% | ||
| CERS - MYO | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| TFX - MYO | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| SMLR - MYO | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
| COO - MYO | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| WAT - MYO | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||