Advertisement
MYO vs NEO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MYO is a Hold and NEO is a Hold.
MYO | NEO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 9 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MYO's Valuation (42) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as NEO (58) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that MYO’s stock grew similarly to NEO’s over the last 12 months.
MYO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Distributors industry is in the same range as NEO (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that MYO’s stock grew similarly to NEO’s over the last 12 months.
NEO's SMR Rating (92) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as MYO (99) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that NEO’s stock grew similarly to MYO’s over the last 12 months.
NEO's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as MYO (35) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that NEO’s stock grew similarly to MYO’s over the last 12 months.
NEO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as MYO (100) in the Medical Distributors industry. This means that NEO’s stock grew similarly to MYO’s over the last 12 months.
| MYO | NEO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MYO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NEO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MYO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NEO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MYO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MYO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NEO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
MYO (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +8.78% price change this week, while NEO (@Medical Specialties) price change was -2.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.93%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
MYO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
NEO is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.06% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
@Medical Specialties (+3.46% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVDS | 79.13 | 0.57 | +0.73% |
| Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) | |||
| IVOG | 138.03 | 0.14 | +0.10% |
| Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) | |||
| CVRD | 18.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) | |||
| TSYW | 39.06 | -0.06 | -0.14% |
| Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) | |||
| LFGY | 20.09 | -0.26 | -1.28% |
| YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF | |||
MYO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MYO has been loosely correlated with NEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MYO jumps, then NEO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MYO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYO | 100% | -3.59% | ||
| NEO - MYO | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| PFSA - MYO | 32% Poorly correlated | -28.05% | ||
| RDNT - MYO | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
| TWST - MYO | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| NTRA - MYO | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
More | ||||
NEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEO has been loosely correlated with NTRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NEO jumps, then NTRA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEO | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| NTRA - NEO | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| TMO - NEO | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| ADPT - NEO | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| RVTY - NEO | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| PSNL - NEO | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||