MZDAF
Price
$6.31
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.29B
TM
Price
$182.30
Change
-$2.17 (-1.18%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
324.08B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MZDAF vs TM

Header iconMZDAF vs TM Comparison
Open Charts MZDAF vs TMBanner chart's image
Mazda Motor
Price$6.31
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization6.29B
Toyota Motor
Price$182.30
Change-$2.17 (-1.18%)
Volume$485.21K
Capitalization324.08B
MZDAF vs TM Comparison Chart
Loading...
TM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MZDAF vs. TM commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MZDAF is a Hold and TM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (MZDAF: $6.31 vs. TM: $182.30)
Brand notoriety: MZDAF and TM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MZDAF: 32% vs. TM: 116%
Market capitalization -- MZDAF: $6.29B vs. TM: $324.08B
MZDAF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $6.29B. TM’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $324.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $559.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MZDAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MZDAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MZDAF is a better buy in the long-term than TM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MZDAF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while TM (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -0.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

TM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-1.41% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TM($324B) has a higher market cap than MZDAF($6.29B). TM has higher P/E ratio than MZDAF: TM (11.02) vs MZDAF (6.17). MZDAF (-6.070) and TM (-6.325) have similar YTD gains . TM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.22T vs. MZDAF (295B). TM has more cash in the bank: 12.23T vs. MZDAF (758B). MZDAF has less debt than TM: MZDAF (720B) vs TM (33.96T). TM has higher revenues than MZDAF: TM (43.71T) vs MZDAF (3.65T).
MZDAFTMMZDAF / TM
Capitalization6.29B324B2%
EBITDA295B8.22T4%
Gain YTD-6.070-6.32596%
P/E Ratio6.1711.0256%
Revenue3.65T43.71T8%
Total Cash758B12.23T6%
Total Debt720B33.96T2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MZDAF vs TM: Fundamental Ratings
MZDAF
TM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5062
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8851
SMR RATING
1..100
240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4474
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MZDAF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TM (45) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that MZDAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TM’s over the last 12 months.

TM's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MZDAF (88) in the null industry. This means that TM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MZDAF’s over the last 12 months.

MZDAF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TM (40) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that MZDAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TM’s over the last 12 months.

TM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MZDAF (59) in the null industry. This means that TM’s stock grew similarly to MZDAF’s over the last 12 months.

MZDAF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as TM (74) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that MZDAF’s stock grew similarly to TM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMI243.460.12
+0.05%
Badger Meter
REFI14.50-0.03
-0.21%
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance
ELME15.60-0.11
-0.70%
Elme Communities
DOW28.32-0.35
-1.22%
Dow
BTCM1.97-0.04
-1.99%
BIT Mining Limited

MZDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MZDAF and HMC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZDAF and HMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZDAF
1D Price
Change %
MZDAF100%
N/A
HMC - MZDAF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
TM - MZDAF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
MAHMF - MZDAF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSANY - MZDAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
MZDAY - MZDAF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More