NA
Price
$5.13
Change
-$0.55 (-9.68%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
118.59M
PXLW
Price
$8.62
Change
-$1.36 (-13.63%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
53.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NA vs PXLW

Header iconNA vs PXLW Comparison
Open Charts NA vs PXLWBanner chart's image
Nano Labs
Price$5.13
Change-$0.55 (-9.68%)
Volume$198.56K
Capitalization118.59M
Pixelworks
Price$8.62
Change-$1.36 (-13.63%)
Volume$300.68K
Capitalization53.25M
NA vs PXLW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PXLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NA vs. PXLW commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NA is a Hold and PXLW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (NA: $5.13 vs. PXLW: $9.98)
Brand notoriety: NA and PXLW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NA: 35% vs. PXLW: 589%
Market capitalization -- NA: $118.59M vs. PXLW: $53.25M
NA [@Semiconductors] is valued at $118.59M. PXLW’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $53.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.39T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $91.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePXLW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PXLW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NA is a better buy in the long-term than PXLW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PXLW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PXLW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PXLW is a better buy in the short-term than NA.

Price Growth

NA (@Semiconductors) experienced а +2.50% price change this week, while PXLW (@Semiconductors) price change was +27.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+0.13% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NA($119M) has a higher market cap than PXLW($53.2M). PXLW YTD gains are higher at: -1.531 vs. NA (-42.691). PXLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -24.95M vs. NA (-61.98M). NA has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. PXLW (14.3M). PXLW has less debt than NA: PXLW (2.65M) vs NA (687M). PXLW has higher revenues than NA: PXLW (34M) vs NA (24.1M).
NAPXLWNA / PXLW
Capitalization119M53.2M224%
EBITDA-61.98M-24.95M248%
Gain YTD-42.691-1.5312,789%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue24.1M34M71%
Total Cash1.14B14.3M7,972%
Total Debt687M2.65M25,974%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PXLW: Fundamental Ratings
PXLW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
31

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAPXLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PXLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLQC64.001.00
+1.59%
Plains Acquisition Corp.
NNUP1.660.01
+0.61%
Nocopi Technologies, Inc.
UELMO61.00N/A
N/A
Union Electric Co.
TNEYF3.92-0.02
-0.51%
Tamarack Valley Energy, Ltd.
SWGAY9.02-0.16
-1.69%
Swatch Group AG

PXLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PXLW has been loosely correlated with AMBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PXLW jumps, then AMBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PXLW
1D Price
Change %
PXLW100%
-13.63%
AMBA - PXLW
36%
Loosely correlated
+16.78%
PENG - PXLW
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
POWI - PXLW
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
NXPI - PXLW
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
VECO - PXLW
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More