Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAEFX vs SCWCX
NAEFX vs SCWCX Comparison
Open Charts NAEFX vs SCWCX
NAEFX vs SCWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAEFX vs. SCWCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAEFX is a Hold and SCWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWCX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. NAEFX (287M). NAEFX pays higher dividends than SCWCX: NAEFX (0.84) vs SCWCX (0.12). NAEFX was incepted earlier than SCWCX: NAEFX (12 years) vs SCWCX (26 years). SCWCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than NAEFX (1.35). SCWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NAEFX (4.09). SCWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: SCWCX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.04 vs. SCWCX (7.14). NAEFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.42 vs. SCWCX (-15.08).
| NAEFX | SCWCX | NAEFX / SCWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.77 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.77 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.378 | 11.709 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3500 | 250 | 1,400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.12 | 707% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.04 | 7.14 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.44 | 33.12 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.42 | -15.08 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.78 | 61.27 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers