Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.46
Change+$0.13 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. NMSAX (2.62B). NMSAX (1.28) and NAESX (1.28) have matching dividends . NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. NMSAX (-5.90). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.13 vs. NMSAX (18.87).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.719 | -5.911 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 2.62B | 5,647% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.28 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | -5.90 | -194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.86 | -4.47 | -825% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.13 | 18.87 | 361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.36 | -0.68 | -15,772% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement