Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.47
Change+$2.78 (+2.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$21.01
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. NMSAX (2.54B). NMSAX (1.27) and NAESX (1.25) have matching dividends . NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. NMSAX (-10.31). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 53.10 vs. NMSAX (4.51).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.246 | -7.190 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 2.54B | 6,075% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.27 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | -10.31 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.77 | -16.77 | -106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.10 | 4.51 | 1,177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.52 | -0.78 | -13,775% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers