Ad is loading...
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.04
Change+$1.67 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$20.43
Change+$0.37 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. NMSAX (2.44B). NAESX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: NAESX (1.43) vs NMSAX (1.35). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSAX (29 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. NMSAX (-16.17). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. NMSAX (18.15).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.414 | -11.513 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 2.44B | 5,742% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.35 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | -16.17 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.27 | -15.45 | -131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.08 | 18.15 | 359% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.81 | -8.01 | -1,096% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers