Ad is loading...
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.10
Change-$7.24 (-6.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
Columbia Small Cap Index A
Price$19.49
Change-$1.49 (-7.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62B
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. NMSAX (2.62B). NAESX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: NAESX (1.39) vs NMSAX (1.30). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (65 years) vs NMSAX (28 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). NMSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: NMSAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. NMSAX (-12.26). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 115.68 vs. NMSAX (53.12).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.833 | -7.455 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 2.62B | 5,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.30 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.18 | -12.26 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.44 | -21.69 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.68 | 53.12 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.61 | -5.37 | -1,687% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers