Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. NMSAX (2.57B). NAESX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: NAESX (1.08) vs NMSAX (0.91). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (66 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: NAESX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.95 vs. NMSAX (19.77). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.38 vs. NMSAX (-16.57).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.680 | 15.164 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 2.57B | 6,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.95 | 19.77 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 11.86 | 463% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.38 | -16.57 | -201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.50 | 24.23 | 662% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement