Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. NMSAX (2.65B). NAESX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: NAESX (1.07) vs NMSAX (0.88). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (66 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: NAESX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. NMSAX (14.10). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. NMSAX (-12.48).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.738 | 13.474 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 2.65B | 7,137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.88 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.34 | 14.10 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.12 | 7.28 | 661% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.39 | -12.48 | -308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.36 | 19.04 | 826% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers