Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. NMSAX (2.48B). NAESX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: NAESX (1.08) vs NMSAX (0.91). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (66 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: NAESX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). NMSAX (27.72) and NAESX (27.66) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. NMSAX (-10.89).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.348 | 19.484 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 2.48B | 7,373% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.66 | 27.72 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.38 | 19.89 | 288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | -10.89 | -308% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.93 | 34.23 | 505% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement