Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs NMSAX
NAESX vs NMSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. NMSAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and NMSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. NMSAX (2.53B). NAESX pays higher dividends than NMSAX: NAESX (1.09) vs NMSAX (0.90). NAESX was incepted earlier than NMSAX: NAESX (66 years) vs NMSAX (30 years). NMSAX (0.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NMSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMSAX: NAESX (0) vs NMSAX (2000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. NMSAX (4.22). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. NMSAX (-15.32).
| NAESX | NMSAX | NAESX / NMSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.45 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.982 | 10.235 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185B | 2.53B | 7,312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.90 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 4.22 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 8.54 | 581% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -15.32 | -214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.60 | 16.39 | 931% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement