Ad is loading...
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.29
Change-$1.38 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$27.81
Change-$0.50 (-1.77%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. QLSCX (1.47B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.31) vs QLSCX (0.30). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (64 years) vs QLSCX (8 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.56 vs. NAESX (30.01). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. QLSCX (45.98).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.003 | 18.643 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151B | 1.47B | 10,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.30 | 435% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.01 | 35.56 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.96 | -12.36 | -48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.10 | 45.98 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...