Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.36
Change-$0.15 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.91
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. QLSCX (1.51B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.20) vs QLSCX (0.33). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. NAESX (10.47). QLSCX (68.07) and NAESX (66.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.555 | 12.006 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 1.51B | 10,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.33 | 368% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.47 | 14.98 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.00 | 48.46 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.22 | 68.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement