Ad is loading...
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.41
Change-$4.89 (-4.06%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$26.86
Change-$1.11 (-3.97%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 167B vs. QLSCX (1.48B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.31) vs QLSCX (0.30). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (64 years) vs QLSCX (8 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.01 vs. NAESX (19.54). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 53.79 vs. QLSCX (41.13).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.994 | 19.326 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167B | 1.48B | 11,314% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.30 | 435% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.54 | 23.01 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.71 | 11.60 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.79 | 41.13 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...