Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.61
Change+$1.26 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$25.96
Change+$0.49 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. QLSCX (1.33B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.35) vs QLSCX (0.38). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. NAESX (5.13). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.20 vs. QLSCX (42.19).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.086 | -5.034 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 1.33B | 11,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.38 | 353% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.13 | 6.77 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.63 | 12.59 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.20 | 42.19 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.08 | N/A | - |