Ad is loading...
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$105.37
Change+$0.38 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$24.24
Change+$0.19 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. QLSCX (1.26B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.43) vs QLSCX (0.41). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.61 vs. NAESX (-0.80). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 64.48 vs. QLSCX (54.63).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.744 | -10.328 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 1.26B | 11,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.41 | 352% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.80 | 0.61 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.78 | 10.78 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.48 | 54.63 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...