Ad is loading...
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$120.74
Change+$1.42 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.27B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$27.87
Change+$0.30 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. QLSCX (1.46B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.31) vs QLSCX (0.30). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (64 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.45 vs. NAESX (20.30). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 55.79 vs. QLSCX (46.20).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.621 | 3.915 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155B | 1.46B | 10,646% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.30 | 435% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.30 | 21.45 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.81 | 16.46 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.79 | 46.20 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.23 | N/A | - |