Ad is loading...
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$26.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Sep 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. QLSCX (1.37B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.31) vs QLSCX (0.30). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (64 years) vs QLSCX (8 years). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 128.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.61 vs. NAESX (20.25). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 51.19 vs. QLSCX (41.46).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.636 | 12.841 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149B | 1.37B | 10,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.30 | 435% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.25 | 28.61 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.58 | -6.81 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.19 | 41.46 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.23 | N/A | - |