Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.70
Change+$1.38 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$26.78
Change+$0.20 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. QLSCX (1.39B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.28) vs QLSCX (0.36). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.35 vs. QLSCX (2.99). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. QLSCX (53.88).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.302 | -0.895 | -34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 1.39B | 11,015% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.36 | 351% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.35 | 2.99 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.91 | 33.79 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.03 | 53.88 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement