Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.05
Change-$0.12 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$27.16
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. QLSCX (1.37B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.25) vs QLSCX (0.36). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. NAESX (9.46). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. QLSCX (46.63).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.067 | 1.268 | 5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 1.37B | 11,266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.36 | 351% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 11.48 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.97 | 24.65 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.21 | 46.63 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement