Ad is loading...
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$99.26
Change+$0.85 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$22.65
Change+$0.23 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. QLSCX (1.17B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.39) vs QLSCX (0.40). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (65 years) vs QLSCX (9 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: QLSCX (0) vs NAESX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.01 vs. NAESX (-2.42). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.71 vs. QLSCX (56.41).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.464 | -16.406 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 1.17B | 12,254% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.40 | 351% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.42 | -1.01 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.49 | -3.84 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.71 | 56.41 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...