Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs QLSCX
NAESX vs QLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. QLSCX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and QLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. QLSCX (2.31B). NAESX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: NAESX (1.10) vs QLSCX (0.29). NAESX was incepted earlier than QLSCX: NAESX (66 years) vs QLSCX (10 years). QLSCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX (0) and QLSCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.81 vs. QLSCX (26.06). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.18 vs. QLSCX (23.04).
| NAESX | QLSCX | NAESX / QLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.88 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.89 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.436 | 20.275 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 2.31B | 7,929% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.29 | 376% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.81 | 26.06 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.59 | 61.07 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.18 | 23.04 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.57 | 121.74 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers