Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RMCFX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.29
Change-$0.07 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RMCFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. RMCFX (311M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: NAESX (1.20) vs RMCFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: NAESX (65 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.54) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: RMCFX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.72 vs. RMCFX (4.78). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.30 vs. RMCFX (17.69).
| NAESX | RMCFX | NAESX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.54 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.425 | 9.935 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 311M | 51,768% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.72 | 4.78 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.83 | 22.19 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.30 | 17.69 | 380% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.42 | -4.73 | -2,799% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement