Ad is loading...
NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RMCFX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$101.55
Change+$8.70 (+9.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RMCFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. RMCFX (230M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: NAESX (1.39) vs RMCFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: NAESX (65 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.55) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: RMCFX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.70 vs. RMCFX (-26.51). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.35 vs. RMCFX (1.77).
| NAESX | RMCFX | NAESX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.55 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.296 | -25.348 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 230M | 62,174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.70 | -26.51 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.18 | -25.97 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.35 | 1.77 | 3,180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.14 | -43.94 | -144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...