Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RMCFX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$123.61
Change+$1.12 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RMCFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. RMCFX (312M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: NAESX (1.23) vs RMCFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: NAESX (65 years) vs RMCFX (23 years). RMCFX (1.54) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: RMCFX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. RMCFX (7.54). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.51 vs. RMCFX (13.06).
| NAESX | RMCFX | NAESX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.54 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.604 | 12.535 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 312M | 51,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 7.54 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.05 | 32.75 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.51 | 13.06 | 433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.38 | -4.17 | -3,151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers