Ad is loading...
NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RMCFX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.03
Change+$0.48 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.27B
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RMCFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. RMCFX (308M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: NAESX (1.31) vs RMCFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: NAESX (64 years) vs RMCFX (22 years). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). RMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: RMCFX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.23 vs. RMCFX (8.34). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.81 vs. RMCFX (-0.73).
| NAESX | RMCFX | NAESX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.370 | 1.300 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155B | 308M | 50,325% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.23 | 8.34 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.16 | -9.31 | -184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.81 | -0.73 | -6,705% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.44 | -20.10 | -629% |