Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RMCFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. RMCFX (390M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: NAESX (1.10) vs RMCFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: NAESX (66 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: NAESX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). RMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.03 vs. NAESX (22.56). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.95 vs. RMCFX (-8.02).
| NAESX | RMCFX | NAESX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.57 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.563 | 33.741 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 390M | 48,462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.56 | 31.03 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.30 | 28.78 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.95 | -8.02 | -436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 155.28 | 26.80 | 579% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement