Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RMCFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. RMCFX (395M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: NAESX (1.09) vs RMCFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: NAESX (66 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: NAESX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). RMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.08 vs. NAESX (13.09). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. RMCFX (-6.08).
| NAESX | RMCFX | NAESX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.57 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.982 | 34.962 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185B | 395M | 46,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 21.08 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 39.55 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -6.08 | -539% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.60 | 26.39 | 578% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement