Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RMCFX
NAESX vs RMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RMCFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. RMCFX (408M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RMCFX: NAESX (1.10) vs RMCFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RMCFX: NAESX (66 years) vs RMCFX (24 years). RMCFX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMCFX: NAESX (0) vs RMCFX (2000). RMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.79 vs. NAESX (24.75). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. RMCFX (-0.54).
| NAESX | RMCFX | NAESX / RMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.57 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.339 | 38.910 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 408M | 44,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.75 | 32.79 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 41.57 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | -0.54 | -7,815% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.41 | 26.54 | 589% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement