Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPFFX
NAESX vs RPFFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPFFX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$123.61
Change+$1.12 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
NAESX vs RPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPFFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and RPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. RPFFX (1.06B). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPFFX: NAESX (1.23) vs RPFFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPFFX: NAESX (65 years) vs RPFFX (23 years). RPFFX (1.59) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RPFFX (12.00). RPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: RPFFX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. RPFFX (-5.04). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.51 vs. RPFFX (-6.91).
| NAESX | RPFFX | NAESX / RPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.59 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.604 | 4.294 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 1.06B | 15,254% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | -5.04 | -181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.05 | 11.08 | 425% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.51 | -6.91 | -818% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.38 | -39.32 | -334% |