Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPFFX
NAESX vs RPFFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPFFX
NAESX vs RPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPFFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. RPFFX (1.13B). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPFFX: NAESX (1.08) vs RPFFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPFFX: NAESX (66 years) vs RPFFX (24 years). RPFFX (1.64) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFFX: NAESX (0) vs RPFFX (2000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.50 vs. RPFFX (18.47). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.56 vs. RPFFX (-17.04).
| NAESX | RPFFX | NAESX / RPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.64 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.064 | 20.749 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 1.13B | 16,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.50 | 18.47 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.99 | 12.23 | 466% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.56 | -17.04 | -203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.26 | -17.40 | -990% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement