Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPFFX
NAESX vs RPFFX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPFFX
NAESX vs RPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPFFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. RPFFX (1.11B). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPFFX: NAESX (1.07) vs RPFFX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPFFX: NAESX (66 years) vs RPFFX (24 years). RPFFX (1.64) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPFFX: NAESX (0) vs RPFFX (2000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. RPFFX (8.90). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. RPFFX (-18.06).
| NAESX | RPFFX | NAESX / RPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.49 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.64 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.738 | 18.927 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 1.11B | 17,012% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.34 | 8.90 | 262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.12 | 4.26 | 1,130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.39 | -18.06 | -213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.36 | -22.94 | -686% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement