Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RPRCX
NAESX vs RPRCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RPRCX
NAESX vs RPRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RPRCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RPRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. RPRCX (1.04B). NAESX pays higher dividends than RPRCX: NAESX (1.09) vs RPRCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than RPRCX: NAESX (66 years) vs RPRCX (23 years). RPRCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RPRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPRCX: NAESX (0) vs RPRCX (2000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. RPRCX (-2.42). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. RPRCX (-26.64).
| NAESX | RPRCX | NAESX / RPRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.24 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 2.46 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.982 | 11.286 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185B | 1.04B | 17,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | -2.42 | -541% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 0.36 | 13,962% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -26.64 | -123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.60 | -34.56 | -442% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers