Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RSCRX
NAESX vs RSCRX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RSCRX
NAESX vs RSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RSCRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RSCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. RSCRX (1B). NAESX (1.08) and RSCRX (1.05) have matching dividends . NAESX was incepted earlier than RSCRX: NAESX (66 years) vs RSCRX (10 years). RSCRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX (0) and RSCRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RSCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.26 vs. NAESX (27.66). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. RSCRX (-18.32).
| NAESX | RSCRX | NAESX / RSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.94 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.96 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.348 | 20.453 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 1B | 18,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.05 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.66 | 29.26 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.38 | 30.06 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | -18.32 | -183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.93 | 24.32 | 711% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers