Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs RSCRX
NAESX vs RSCRX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs RSCRX
NAESX vs RSCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. RSCRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and RSCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. RSCRX (997M). NAESX pays higher dividends than RSCRX: NAESX (1.07) vs RSCRX (0.99). NAESX was incepted earlier than RSCRX: NAESX (66 years) vs RSCRX (10 years). RSCRX (0.96) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). RSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX (0) and RSCRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RSCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.83 vs. NAESX (23.34). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. RSCRX (-13.62).
| NAESX | RSCRX | NAESX / RSCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.94 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.96 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.738 | 22.248 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 997M | 18,957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.99 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.34 | 25.83 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.12 | 25.66 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.39 | -13.62 | -282% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.36 | 17.97 | 876% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement