Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WBCIX
NAESX vs WBCIX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WBCIX
NAESX vs WBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WBCIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WBCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WBCIX (264M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WBCIX: NAESX (1.08) vs WBCIX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WBCIX: NAESX (66 years) vs WBCIX (7 years). WBCIX (1.19) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WBCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCIX: NAESX (0) vs WBCIX (500000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.66 vs. WBCIX (18.89). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. WBCIX (24.38).
| NAESX | WBCIX | NAESX / WBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.19 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.348 | 13.237 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 264M | 69,318% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.66 | 18.89 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.38 | 33.91 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | 24.38 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement