Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WBCIX
NAESX vs WBCIX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WBCIX
NAESX vs WBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WBCIX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WBCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. WBCIX (260M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WBCIX: NAESX (1.08) vs WBCIX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WBCIX: NAESX (66 years) vs WBCIX (7 years). WBCIX (1.19) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WBCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCIX: NAESX (0) vs WBCIX (500000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.95 vs. WBCIX (17.34). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.38 vs. WBCIX (22.39).
| NAESX | WBCIX | NAESX / WBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.19 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.680 | 10.770 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 260M | 68,077% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.95 | 17.34 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 30.90 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.38 | 22.39 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement