Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WBCRX
NAESX vs WBCRX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WBCRX
NAESX vs WBCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WBCRX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WBCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WBCRX (275M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WBCRX: NAESX (1.10) vs WBCRX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WBCRX: NAESX (66 years) vs WBCRX (7 years). WBCRX (1.04) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCRX: NAESX (0) vs WBCRX (1000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.23 vs. WBCRX (17.08). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 45.40 vs. WBCRX (33.76).
| NAESX | WBCRX | NAESX / WBCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.04 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.547 | 17.357 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 275M | 66,545% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.23 | 17.08 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.10 | 37.42 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.40 | 33.76 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement