Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGAX
NAESX vs WHGAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGAX
NAESX vs WHGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WHGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WHGAX (888M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGAX: NAESX (1.08) vs WHGAX (0.57). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGAX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGAX (7 years). WHGAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGAX: NAESX (0) vs WHGAX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.50 vs. WHGAX (13.13). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.56 vs. WHGAX (4.60).
| NAESX | WHGAX | NAESX / WHGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.04 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.18 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.064 | 14.233 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 888M | 20,608% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.57 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.50 | 13.13 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.99 | 20.02 | 285% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.56 | 4.60 | 751% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement