Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGAX
NAESX vs WHGAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGAX
NAESX vs WHGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WHGAX (844M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGAX: NAESX (1.10) vs WHGAX (0.54). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGAX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGAX (7 years). WHGAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGAX: NAESX (0) vs WHGAX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.75 vs. WHGAX (7.46). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. WHGAX (10.40).
| NAESX | WHGAX | NAESX / WHGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.04 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.18 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.339 | 15.074 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 844M | 21,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.54 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.75 | 7.46 | 332% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 18.36 | 317% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 10.40 | 405% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers