Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGCX
NAESX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.51
Change+$0.13 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
Price$20.45
Change-$0.09 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
NAESX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. WHGCX (1.02B). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: NAESX (1.20) vs WHGCX (0.25). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGCX (6 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WHGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WHGCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.21 vs. WHGCX (-3.08). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 70.59 vs. WHGCX (44.76).
| NAESX | WHGCX | NAESX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.79 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.93 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.442 | 3.164 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 1.02B | 15,831% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.25 | 485% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | -3.08 | -429% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.98 | 17.99 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.59 | 44.76 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.44 | N/A | - |