Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGCX
NAESX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGCX
NAESX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. WHGCX (773M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: NAESX (1.09) vs WHGCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGCX (7 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: NAESX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. WHGCX (-1.58). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. WHGCX (1.94).
| NAESX | WHGCX | NAESX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.79 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.93 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.982 | 9.552 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185B | 773M | 23,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | -1.58 | -827% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 10.64 | 466% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | 1.94 | 1,685% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers