Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGCX
NAESX vs WHGCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGCX
NAESX vs WHGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WHGCX (844M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGCX: NAESX (1.10) vs WHGCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGCX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGCX (7 years). WHGCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGCX: NAESX (0) vs WHGCX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.75 vs. WHGCX (6.55). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. WHGCX (5.99).
| NAESX | WHGCX | NAESX / WHGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.79 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.93 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.339 | 14.514 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 844M | 21,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.75 | 6.55 | 378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 15.47 | 376% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 5.99 | 702% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement