Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGMX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.04
Change+$1.67 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Inst
Price$15.01
Change+$0.18 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.53M
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGMX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. WHGMX (88.5M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: NAESX (1.43) vs WHGMX (1.31). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGMX (19 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGMX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGMX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. WHGMX (-1.97). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. WHGMX (47.44).
| NAESX | WHGMX | NAESX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.07 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.414 | -6.376 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 88.5M | 158,192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.31 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | -1.97 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.27 | 22.48 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.08 | 47.44 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.81 | -7.72 | -1,138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...