Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGMX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Inst
Price$16.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.12M
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGMX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WHGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WHGMX (98.1M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: NAESX (1.23) vs WHGMX (1.12). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGMX (20 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGMX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGMX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.94 vs. WHGMX (2.85). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 55.32 vs. WHGMX (43.67).
| NAESX | WHGMX | NAESX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.07 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.604 | 6.566 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 98.1M | 165,138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.12 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | 2.85 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.95 | 41.92 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.32 | 43.67 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.22 | 13.66 | 953% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement