Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGMX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WHGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. WHGMX (112M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: NAESX (1.07) vs WHGMX (0.36). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGMX (21 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGMX: NAESX (0) vs WHGMX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.61 vs. WHGMX (14.47). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 35.95 vs. WHGMX (25.61).
| NAESX | WHGMX | NAESX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.85 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.07 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.457 | 15.300 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 112M | 168,750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.36 | 298% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.61 | 14.47 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.52 | 37.03 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.95 | 25.61 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.06 | 35.03 | 434% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers