Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGMX
NAESX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGMX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WHGMX (111M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: NAESX (1.08) vs WHGMX (0.37). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGMX (21 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGMX: NAESX (0) vs WHGMX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.41 vs. WHGMX (20.73). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.15 vs. WHGMX (19.96).
| NAESX | WHGMX | NAESX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.85 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.07 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.016 | 16.524 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 111M | 164,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.37 | 289% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.41 | 20.73 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.49 | 46.69 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.15 | 19.96 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.37 | 42.24 | 399% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers