Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGSX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.49
Change-$1.24 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$20.51
Change-$0.20 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets995.02M
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGSX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WHGSX (995M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: NAESX (1.23) vs WHGSX (0.81). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGSX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.42 vs. WHGSX (-4.26). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 58.94 vs. WHGSX (43.36).
| NAESX | WHGSX | NAESX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.04 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.684 | 2.272 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 995M | 16,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.81 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.42 | -4.26 | -245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.54 | 25.63 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.94 | 43.36 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.72 | 61.79 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement