Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGSX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.69
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Inst
Price$19.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets905.05M
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WHGSX (905M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: NAESX (1.22) vs WHGSX (0.85). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: NAESX (65 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: NAESX (3000) vs WHGSX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.86 vs. WHGSX (-13.31). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 39.31 vs. WHGSX (24.40).
| NAESX | WHGSX | NAESX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.90 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.04 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.409 | -4.346 | -55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 905M | 17,901% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.85 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.86 | -13.31 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.99 | 2.20 | 1,364% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.31 | 24.40 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.07 | 51.87 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement