Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. WHGSX (848M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: NAESX (1.08) vs WHGSX (0.69). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: NAESX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.95 vs. WHGSX (10.78). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.38 vs. WHGSX (-2.00).
| NAESX | WHGSX | NAESX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.92 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.06 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.680 | 8.325 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 848M | 20,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.69 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.95 | 10.78 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 13.39 | 410% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.38 | -2.00 | -1,672% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.50 | 66.30 | 242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement