Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. WHGSX (877M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: NAESX (1.07) vs WHGSX (0.64). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: NAESX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.34 vs. WHGSX (7.06). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 38.39 vs. WHGSX (9.92).
| NAESX | WHGSX | NAESX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.92 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.06 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.738 | 14.974 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 877M | 21,551% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.64 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.34 | 7.06 | 331% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.12 | 15.03 | 320% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.39 | 9.92 | 387% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.36 | 66.74 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers