Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WHGSX
NAESX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WHGSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WHGSX (844M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WHGSX: NAESX (1.10) vs WHGSX (0.65). NAESX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: NAESX (66 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGSX: NAESX (0) vs WHGSX (100000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.75 vs. WHGSX (7.62). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. WHGSX (11.18).
| NAESX | WHGSX | NAESX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 0.92 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.06 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.339 | 15.131 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 844M | 21,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.75 | 7.62 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 18.87 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 11.18 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.41 | 62.30 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement