Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMCVX
NAESX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMCVX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.70
Change+$0.08 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
NAESX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMCVX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. WMCVX (1.56B). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: NAESX (1.25) vs WMCVX (0.06). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMCVX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. WMCVX (-11.21). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 56.12 vs. WMCVX (30.45).
| NAESX | WMCVX | NAESX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.18 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.18 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.563 | -3.343 | -17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 1.56B | 9,789% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.06 | 2,014% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | -11.21 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.05 | 6.65 | 362% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.12 | 30.45 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.89 | 49.63 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement