Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMCVX
NAESX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMCVX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.13
Change-$1.18 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
NAESX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. WMCVX (1.58B). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: NAESX (1.28) vs WMCVX (0.06). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMCVX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. WMCVX (-13.66). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.85 vs. WMCVX (44.95).
| NAESX | WMCVX | NAESX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.18 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.18 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.006 | -2.432 | -41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 1.58B | 9,671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.06 | 2,034% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | -13.66 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.57 | 20.14 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.85 | 44.95 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.46 | 46.04 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement