Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMCVX
NAESX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMCVX
NAESX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WMCVX (1.38B). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: NAESX (1.08) vs WMCVX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: NAESX (66 years) vs WMCVX (29 years). WMCVX (1.17) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMCVX: NAESX (0) vs WMCVX (2000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.41 vs. WMCVX (7.87). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.15 vs. WMCVX (-11.42).
| NAESX | WMCVX | NAESX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.17 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.17 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.016 | 11.607 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 1.38B | 13,251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.41 | 7.87 | 348% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.49 | 11.55 | 446% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.15 | -11.42 | -281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.37 | 70.38 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers