Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMCVX
NAESX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMCVX
NAESX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. WMCVX (1.31B). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: NAESX (1.07) vs WMCVX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: NAESX (66 years) vs WMCVX (29 years). WMCVX (1.17) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMCVX: NAESX (0) vs WMCVX (2000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.15 vs. WMCVX (2.35). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 36.65 vs. WMCVX (-7.04).
| NAESX | WMCVX | NAESX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.17 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.17 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.041 | 11.942 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189B | 1.31B | 14,384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.15 | 2.35 | 859% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.42 | 4.76 | 955% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.65 | -7.04 | -520% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.66 | 61.08 | 253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers