Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$114.78
Change-$3.10 (-2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.88B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.88
Change-$0.29 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.02M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. WMMAX (214M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.31) vs WMMAX (0.29). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (64 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.22 vs. WMMAX (-15.49). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 44.30 vs. WMMAX (-40.12).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.321 | -0.067 | 478% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 214M | 75,234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.29 | 452% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.22 | -15.49 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.76 | -35.77 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.30 | -40.12 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.17 | -35.67 | -295% |