Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$113.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$15.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Sep 20, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. WMMAX (264M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.31) vs WMMAX (0.29). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (64 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.72 vs. WMMAX (-24.83). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 51.64 vs. WMMAX (-39.54).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.695 | -17.275 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149B | 264M | 56,439% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.29 | 452% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.72 | -24.83 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.63 | -47.06 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.64 | -39.54 | -131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.34 | -34.70 | -327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...