Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$108.19
Change-$0.40 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.28
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.25M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. WMMAX (192M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.43) vs WMMAX (0.01). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.75 vs. WMMAX (-20.92). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.31 vs. WMMAX (-23.39).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.554 | -3.559 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 192M | 72,917% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.01 | 10,335% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.75 | -20.92 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.26 | -32.22 | -69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.31 | -23.39 | -288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.72 | -38.47 | -236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement