Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.67
Change-$0.27 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.04M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. WMMAX (193M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.35) vs WMMAX (0.01). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. WMMAX (-16.40). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. WMMAX (-25.88).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.390 | -1.478 | 297% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 193M | 76,684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.01 | 10,379% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.19 | -16.40 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.28 | -28.82 | -109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.19 | -25.88 | -244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.88 | -37.91 | -245% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement