Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$15.88
Change+$0.11 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. WMMAX (202M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.28) vs WMMAX (0.01). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. WMMAX (-17.85). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.65 vs. WMMAX (-22.34).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.154 | 5.910 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 202M | 75,743% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.01 | 10,245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | -17.85 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.33 | -26.22 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.65 | -22.34 | -294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.41 | -30.70 | -369% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement