Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.03
Change+$0.48 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.27B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.77M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. WMMAX (226M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.31) vs WMMAX (0.29). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (64 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.23 vs. WMMAX (-12.45). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.81 vs. WMMAX (-40.57).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.370 | 1.007 | 334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155B | 226M | 68,584% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.29 | 452% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.23 | -12.45 | -171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.16 | -38.67 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.81 | -40.57 | -120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.44 | -33.09 | -382% |