Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.98
Change+$1.67 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$16.22
Change+$0.30 (+1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.94M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. WMMAX (192M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.23) vs WMMAX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). WMMAX (4.81) and NAESX (4.75) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.74 vs. WMMAX (-28.27).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.577 | 6.917 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 192M | 84,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 4.81 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.69 | -21.48 | -203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.74 | -28.27 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.99 | -28.90 | -450% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement