Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.76
Change-$0.34 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$16.42
Change-$0.08 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.73M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. WMMAX (203M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.20) vs WMMAX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). WMMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.85 vs. NAESX (7.76). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.13 vs. WMMAX (-21.86).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.199 | 10.813 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161B | 203M | 79,310% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 9.85 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.63 | -14.52 | -349% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.13 | -21.86 | -312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.91 | -22.69 | -621% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement