Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.41
Change-$4.89 (-4.06%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.87
Change-$0.65 (-4.19%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 167B vs. WMMAX (246M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.31) vs WMMAX (0.29). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (64 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.54 vs. WMMAX (-11.20). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 53.79 vs. WMMAX (-36.97).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.994 | -14.006 | -128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167B | 246M | 67,886% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.29 | 452% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.54 | -11.20 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.71 | -36.99 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.79 | -36.97 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.30 | -32.36 | -384% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...