Ad is loading...
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.13
Change+$2.17 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$13.37
Change+$0.14 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.71M
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. WMMAX (181M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.39) vs WMMAX (0.01). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (65 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: WMMAX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.36 vs. WMMAX (-25.75). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.57 vs. WMMAX (-24.53).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.50 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.247 | -11.148 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 181M | 79,006% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.01 | 10,386% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.36 | -25.75 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.67 | -41.28 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.57 | -24.53 | -292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.60 | -43.93 | -179% |