Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and WMMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. WMMAX (197M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.08) vs WMMAX (0.40). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (66 years) vs WMMAX (25 years). WMMAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: NAESX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.95 vs. WMMAX (13.10). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.38 vs. WMMAX (-46.50).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.53 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.53 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.680 | 20.104 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 197M | 89,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.40 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.95 | 13.10 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | -17.90 | -306% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.38 | -46.50 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.50 | -27.39 | -586% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement