Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. WMMAX (205M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.08) vs WMMAX (0.40). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (66 years) vs WMMAX (25 years). WMMAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: NAESX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.66 vs. WMMAX (14.93). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. WMMAX (-42.79).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.53 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.53 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.348 | 26.136 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183B | 205M | 89,268% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.40 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.66 | 14.93 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.38 | -14.04 | -409% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.59 | -42.79 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.93 | -22.51 | -768% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement