Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs WMMAX
NAESX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. WMMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. WMMAX (198M). NAESX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: NAESX (1.09) vs WMMAX (0.39). NAESX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: NAESX (66 years) vs WMMAX (25 years). WMMAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: NAESX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. WMMAX (0.72). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. WMMAX (-40.88).
| NAESX | WMMAX | NAESX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.53 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.53 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 66 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.982 | 23.976 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185B | 198M | 93,434% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.39 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 0.72 | 1,820% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | -15.73 | -315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -40.88 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.60 | -27.58 | -553% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers