Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs ZSCCX
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs ZSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.53
Change-$0.17 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and ZSCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. ZSCCX (28.6M). NAESX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: NAESX (1.28) vs ZSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: NAESX (65 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: ZSCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. ZSCCX (-16.69). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 64.98 vs. ZSCCX (46.17).
| NAESX | ZSCCX | NAESX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.39 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.71 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.502 | 0.588 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153B | 28.6M | 534,965% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | -16.69 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.53 | 8.90 | 422% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.98 | 46.17 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.40 | 23.64 | 454% |