Ad is loading...
NAESX vs ZSCCX
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs ZSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.25
Change+$1.25 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Zacks Small-Cap Core I
Price$30.69
Change+$0.17 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and ZSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 167B vs. ZSCCX (31.6M). NAESX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: NAESX (1.31) vs ZSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: NAESX (64 years) vs ZSCCX (13 years). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: ZSCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.50 vs. ZSCCX (-8.93). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 47.90 vs. ZSCCX (13.48).
| NAESX | ZSCCX | NAESX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 64 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.022 | -9.549 | -147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167B | 31.6M | 528,481% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.50 | -8.93 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.57 | -7.22 | -146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.90 | 13.48 | 355% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.27 | 33.65 | 343% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...