Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NAESX vs ZSCCX
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs ZSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$111.61
Change+$1.26 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a StrongBuy and ZSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. ZSCCX (27.9M). NAESX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: NAESX (1.35) vs ZSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: NAESX (65 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: ZSCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. ZSCCX (-14.80). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 52.20 vs. ZSCCX (38.18).
| NAESX | ZSCCX | NAESX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.39 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.71 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.086 | -3.919 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 27.9M | 530,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.13 | -14.80 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.63 | -7.47 | -223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.20 | 38.18 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.08 | 21.40 | 449% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement