Ad is loading...
NAESX vs ZSCCX
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts NAESX vs ZSCCX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$106.28
Change+$2.32 (+2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
NAESX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NAESX vs. ZSCCX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAESX is a Buy and ZSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. ZSCCX (26.7M). NAESX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: NAESX (1.43) vs ZSCCX (0.00). NAESX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: NAESX (65 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: ZSCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.44 vs. ZSCCX (-17.44). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 72.54 vs. ZSCCX (52.31).
| NAESX | ZSCCX | NAESX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.39 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.17 | 1.71 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 65 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.640 | -9.536 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 143B | 26.7M | 535,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | -17.44 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.52 | -8.62 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.54 | 52.31 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.95 | 17.73 | 496% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...