Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NALFX vs RSEBX
NALFX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts NALFX vs RSEBX
NALFX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NALFX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NALFX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. NALFX (314M). NALFX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: NALFX (0.98) vs RSEBX (0.31). NALFX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: NALFX (44 years) vs RSEBX (12 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NALFX (1.10). RSEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NALFX (4.09). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NALFX: RSEBX (250) vs NALFX (2500). NALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.18 vs. RSEBX (23.10). NALFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.28 vs. RSEBX (-3.48).
| NALFX | RSEBX | NALFX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.775 | 16.593 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.31 | 315% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.18 | 23.10 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.07 | 40.78 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.28 | -3.48 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.48 | 95.67 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement