Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NALFX vs RSLAX
NALFX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts NALFX vs RSLAX
NALFX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NALFX vs. RSLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NALFX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. NALFX (287M). NALFX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: NALFX (1.05) vs RSLAX (0.17). NALFX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: NALFX (44 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than NALFX (1.10). RSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NALFX (4.09). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NALFX: RSLAX (250) vs NALFX (2500). NALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. RSLAX (7.36). NALFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.20 vs. RSLAX (-14.43).
| NALFX | RSLAX | NALFX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.74 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.74 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.562 | 11.723 | 73% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.17 | 610% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.33 | 7.36 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.46 | 33.50 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.20 | -14.43 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.41 | 63.67 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement