Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NALFX vs RSLFX
NALFX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts NALFX vs RSLFX
NALFX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NALFX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NALFX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. NALFX (287M). NALFX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: NALFX (1.05) vs RSLFX (0.81). NALFX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: NALFX (44 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). NALFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NALFX (4.09). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NALFX: RSLFX (250) vs NALFX (2500). NALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. RSLFX (9.55). NALFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.20 vs. RSLFX (-7.47).
| NALFX | RSLFX | NALFX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.70 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.70 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.562 | 12.524 | 68% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.81 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.33 | 9.55 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.46 | 39.09 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.20 | -7.47 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.41 | 90.43 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement