Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NASDX vs RGACX
NASDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NASDX vs RGACX
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Investor
Price$45.99
Change-$0.20 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
NASDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NASDX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NASDX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. NASDX (2.08B). NASDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: NASDX (0.23) vs RGACX (0.07). NASDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NASDX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NASDX (0.64). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NASDX (11.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NASDX: RGACX (250) vs NASDX (1000). NASDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.97 vs. RGACX (15.15). NASDX return over 5 years is better than : 81.76 vs. RGACX (45.12).
| NASDX | RGACX | NASDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.278 | 18.822 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.07 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.97 | 15.15 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.96 | 66.19 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.76 | 45.12 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 335.08 | 103.64 | 323% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement