Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NASDX vs RGACX
NASDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NASDX vs RGACX
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Investor
Price$43.97
Change-$0.22 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NASDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NASDX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NASDX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NASDX (2.01B). NASDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: NASDX (0.26) vs RGACX (0.07). NASDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NASDX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NASDX (0.64). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NASDX (11.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NASDX: RGACX (250) vs NASDX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. NASDX (12.60). NASDX return over 5 years is better than : 74.95 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| NASDX | RGACX | NASDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.94 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.027 | 14.044 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 0.07 | 364% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 14.08 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.01 | 41.19 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.95 | 41.95 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 292.29 | 83.68 | 349% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement