Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NASDX vs RGACX
NASDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NASDX vs RGACX
NASDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NASDX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NASDX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NASDX (2.37B). NASDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: NASDX (0.16) vs RGACX (0.00). NASDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NASDX (26 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NASDX (0.64). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NASDX (15.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NASDX: RGACX (250) vs NASDX (500000). NASDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.22 vs. RGACX (7.94). NASDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.83 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| NASDX | RGACX | NASDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.93 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.215 | 6.185 | 327% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.22 | 7.94 | 456% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.20 | 43.05 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.83 | 13.23 | 536% |
| Returns for 10 years | 415.35 | 107.97 | 385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement