Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NASDX vs RGACX
NASDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NASDX vs RGACX
NASDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NASDX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NASDX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NASDX (2.32B). NASDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: NASDX (0.15) vs RGACX (0.00). NASDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NASDX (27 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NASDX (0.64). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NASDX (15.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NASDX: RGACX (250) vs NASDX (500000). NASDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.89 vs. RGACX (3.68). NASDX return over 5 years is better than : 58.07 vs. RGACX (13.46).
| NASDX | RGACX | NASDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.93 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.93 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.117 | 6.959 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.89 | 3.68 | 676% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.25 | 37.13 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.07 | 13.46 | 431% |
| Returns for 10 years | 364.73 | 97.58 | 374% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement