NATH
Price
$105.32
Change
+$1.52 (+1.46%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
430.71M
RICK
Price
$37.47
Change
-$0.47 (-1.24%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
326.76M
116 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NATH vs RICK

Header iconNATH vs RICK Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs RICKBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$105.32
Change+$1.52 (+1.46%)
Volume$40.67K
Capitalization430.71M
RCI Hospitality Holdings
Price$37.47
Change-$0.47 (-1.24%)
Volume$58.56K
Capitalization326.76M
NATH vs RICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. RICK commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a Hold and RICK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (NATH: $105.32 vs. RICK: $37.47)
Brand notoriety: NATH and RICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 67% vs. RICK: 72%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $430.71M vs. RICK: $326.76M
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $430.71M. RICK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $326.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRICK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RICK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than RICK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RICK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RICK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than RICK.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а +8.30% price change this week, while RICK (@Restaurants) price change was +6.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

RICK is expected to report earnings on Dec 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.78% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NATH($431M) has a higher market cap than RICK($327M). RICK has higher P/E ratio than NATH: RICK (20.29) vs NATH (18.28). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 35.277 vs. RICK (-34.585). RICK (39.7M) and NATH (37.8M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . NATH has less debt than RICK: NATH (56.8M) vs RICK (271M). RICK has higher revenues than NATH: RICK (287M) vs NATH (148M).
NATHRICKNATH / RICK
Capitalization431M327M132%
EBITDA37.8M39.7M95%
Gain YTD35.277-34.585-102%
P/E Ratio18.2820.2990%
Revenue148M287M52%
Total Cash7.71MN/A-
Total Debt56.8M271M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs RICK: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
RICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1468
SMR RATING
1..100
4087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5079
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RICK's Valuation (53) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as NATH (67) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (68) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (87) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (79) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RICK (99) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew significantly faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHRICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRCKF0.590.01
+1.72%
Inter-Rock Minerals, Inc.
PFLC11.41N/A
N/A
Pacific Financial Corp.
DETRF2.89N/A
N/A
DETERRA ROYALTIES LTD.
GCHEF8.36N/A
N/A
Grupo Comercial Chedrui SAB de CV
AAGIY38.36-0.62
-1.59%
AIA Group, Ltd.

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with BROS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then BROS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+1.46%
BROS - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
LOCO - NATH
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
PZZA - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
RICK - NATH
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
CMG - NATH
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
More

RICK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RICK has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RICK jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RICK
1D Price
Change %
RICK100%
-1.24%
FRSH - RICK
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
KRUS - RICK
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
CAKE - RICK
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
BJRI - RICK
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
TXRH - RICK
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
More