NATH
Price
$78.08
Change
+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
318.93M
12 days until earnings call
RICK
Price
$52.32
Change
+$0.12 (+0.23%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
465.65M
113 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NATH vs RICK

Header iconNATH vs RICK Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs RICKBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$78.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$7.77K
Capitalization318.93M
RCI Hospitality Holdings
Price$52.32
Change+$0.12 (+0.23%)
Volume$43.85K
Capitalization465.65M
NATH vs RICK Comparison Chart
Loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. RICK commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a Hold and RICK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NATH: $78.08 vs. RICK: $52.32)
Brand notoriety: NATH and RICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 64% vs. RICK: 45%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $318.93M vs. RICK: $465.65M
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $318.93M. RICK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $465.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $201.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRICK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RICK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than RICK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RICK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RICK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the short-term than RICK.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.68% price change this week, while RICK (@Restaurants) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +161.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

NATH is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

RICK is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RICK($466M) has a higher market cap than NATH($319M). RICK has higher P/E ratio than NATH: RICK (158.55) vs NATH (14.62). NATH YTD gains are higher at: -0.674 vs. RICK (-8.961). NATH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.6M vs. RICK (34.7M). RICK (32.4M) and NATH (31.2M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NATH has less debt than RICK: NATH (65.6M) vs RICK (272M). RICK has higher revenues than NATH: RICK (296M) vs NATH (144M).
NATHRICKNATH / RICK
Capitalization319M466M68%
EBITDA36.6M34.7M105%
Gain YTD-0.674-8.9618%
P/E Ratio14.62158.559%
Revenue144M296M49%
Total Cash31.2M32.4M96%
Total Debt65.6M272M24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs RICK: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
RICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6964
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4750
SMR RATING
1..100
4089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
562
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (26) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (88) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (50) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (89) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as NATH (55) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATH (56) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHRICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FALAX49.450.46
+0.94%
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap A
MASCX12.110.09
+0.75%
BlackRock Sustainable Advantage GlEqInvA
GCVRX23.630.14
+0.60%
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts R
CBEJX10.390.05
+0.48%
Allspring Large Cap Value CL R6
JATTX26.670.12
+0.45%
Janus Henderson Triton T

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
+0.03%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
PBPB - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
LOCO - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
KRUS - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
-9.26%
RICK - NATH
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More