NATH
Price
$82.46
Change
-$2.96 (-3.47%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:20 PM (EDT)
44 days until earnings call
RICK
Price
$56.92
Change
-$1.12 (-1.93%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NATH vs RICK

Header iconNATH vs RICK Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs RICKBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$82.46
Change-$2.96 (-3.47%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
RCI Hospitality Holdings
Price$56.92
Change-$1.12 (-1.93%)
Volume$2.73K
CapitalizationN/A
NATH vs RICK Comparison Chart
Loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. RICK commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a Hold and RICK is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NATH: $85.42 vs. RICK: $58.04)
Brand notoriety: NATH and RICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 109% vs. RICK: 563%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $348.91M vs. RICK: $516.56M
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $348.91M. RICK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $516.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRICK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RICK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than RICK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RICK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RICK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RICK is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.22% price change this week, while RICK (@Restaurants) price change was +11.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

NATH is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

RICK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-4.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RICK($517M) has a higher market cap than NATH($349M). RICK has higher P/E ratio than NATH: RICK (175.88) vs NATH (16.00). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 12.481 vs. RICK (-11.943). RICK (37.1M) and NATH (36.6M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . NATH has less debt than RICK: NATH (66M) vs RICK (281M). RICK has higher revenues than NATH: RICK (298M) vs NATH (144M).
NATHRICKNATH / RICK
Capitalization349M517M68%
EBITDA36.6M37.1M99%
Gain YTD12.481-11.943-105%
P/E Ratio16.00175.889%
Revenue144M298M48%
Total Cash16MN/A-
Total Debt66M281M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs RICK: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
RICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8479
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4746
SMR RATING
1..100
4087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
482
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (27) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (90) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as NATH (47) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's SMR Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RICK (87) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (48) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATH (48) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHRICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNECX19.83N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term L
IRGIX10.23-0.02
-0.20%
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate I
FHOFX26.39-0.08
-0.30%
Fidelity Series Large Cp Grwth Idx
OAZBX36.70-0.23
-0.62%
Oakmark Equity and Income R6
HNRIX27.32-0.20
-0.73%
Hennessy Energy Transition Instl

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-1.58%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
PBPB - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.11%
RICK - NATH
33%
Loosely correlated
+11.34%
BH - NATH
28%
Poorly correlated
+8.66%
KRUS - NATH
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
More