NATH
Price
$109.59
Change
-$0.16 (-0.15%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
450.58M
TXRH
Price
$193.02
Change
+$0.08 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
12.8B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NATH vs TXRH

Header iconNATH vs TXRH Comparison
Open Charts NATH vs TXRHBanner chart's image
Nathan's Famous
Price$109.59
Change-$0.16 (-0.15%)
Volume$72.29K
Capitalization450.58M
Texas Roadhouse
Price$193.02
Change+$0.08 (+0.04%)
Volume$2.48M
Capitalization12.8B
NATH vs TXRH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NATH vs. TXRH commentary
Jun 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NATH is a Hold and TXRH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 22, 2025
Stock price -- (NATH: $109.59 vs. TXRH: $193.02)
Brand notoriety: NATH and TXRH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NATH: 212% vs. TXRH: 228%
Market capitalization -- NATH: $450.58M vs. TXRH: $12.8B
NATH [@Restaurants] is valued at $450.58M. TXRH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $12.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $205.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NATH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTXRH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NATH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TXRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATH is a better buy in the long-term than TXRH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NATH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXRH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NATH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TXRH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TXRH is a better buy in the short-term than NATH.

Price Growth

NATH (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.76% price change this week, while TXRH (@Restaurants) price change was +5.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

NATH is expected to report earnings on Jun 10, 2025.

TXRH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.13% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TXRH($12.8B) has a higher market cap than NATH($451M). TXRH has higher P/E ratio than NATH: TXRH (29.78) vs NATH (18.77). NATH YTD gains are higher at: 40.120 vs. TXRH (7.779). TXRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 705M vs. NATH (37.8M). TXRH has more cash in the bank: 221M vs. NATH (27.8M). NATH has less debt than TXRH: NATH (55.9M) vs TXRH (908M). TXRH has higher revenues than NATH: TXRH (5.5B) vs NATH (148M).
NATHTXRHNATH / TXRH
Capitalization451M12.8B4%
EBITDA37.8M705M5%
Gain YTD40.1207.779516%
P/E Ratio18.7729.7863%
Revenue148M5.5B3%
Total Cash27.8M221M13%
Total Debt55.9M908M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATH vs TXRH: Fundamental Ratings
NATH
TXRH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
108
SMR RATING
1..100
4129
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NATH's Valuation (66) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TXRH (72). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to TXRH’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (10). This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's SMR Rating (29) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NATH (41). This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to NATH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TXRH (47). This means that NATH’s stock grew similarly to TXRH’s over the last 12 months.

NATH's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TXRH (67). This means that NATH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TXRH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NATHTXRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICFAX9.270.02
+0.22%
ICON Consumer Select Investor
SVAAX6.050.01
+0.17%
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div A
GURCX31.75-0.09
-0.28%
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate C
TSEGX15.75-0.15
-0.94%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr Inst
EKWCX78.01-0.78
-0.99%
Allspring Precious Metals C

NATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATH has been loosely correlated with LOCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATH jumps, then LOCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATH
1D Price
Change %
NATH100%
-1.34%
LOCO - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+8.84%
DIN - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.46%
PZZA - NATH
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
PBPB - NATH
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
TXRH - NATH
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More

TXRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXRH has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TXRH jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TXRH
1D Price
Change %
TXRH100%
+0.04%
CAKE - TXRH
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
DRI - TXRH
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
EAT - TXRH
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
SHAK - TXRH
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.49%
BJRI - TXRH
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More