NAUBF
Price
$24.53
Change
-$1.47 (-5.65%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
59.59B
SCBFF
Price
$16.55
Change
+$0.24 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.81B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NAUBF vs SCBFF

Header iconNAUBF vs SCBFF Comparison
Open Charts NAUBF vs SCBFFBanner chart's image
National Australia Bank Ltd. (Victoria, Australia)
Price$24.53
Change-$1.47 (-5.65%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization59.59B
Standard Chartered
Price$16.55
Change+$0.24 (+1.47%)
Volume$4.27K
Capitalization26.81B
NAUBF vs SCBFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NAUBF vs. SCBFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NAUBF is a Hold and SCBFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NAUBF: $24.53 vs. SCBFF: $16.55)
Brand notoriety: NAUBF and SCBFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NAUBF: 242% vs. SCBFF: 65%
Market capitalization -- NAUBF: $59.59B vs. SCBFF: $26.81B
NAUBF [@Major Banks] is valued at $59.59B. SCBFF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $26.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NAUBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBFF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NAUBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCBFF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the long-term than NAUBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NAUBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NAUBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SCBFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBFF is a better buy in the short-term than NAUBF.

Price Growth

NAUBF (@Major Banks) experienced а -4.55% price change this week, while SCBFF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

NAUBF is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

SCBFF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.53% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAUBF($59.6B) has a higher market cap than SCBFF($26.8B). NAUBF has higher P/E ratio than SCBFF: NAUBF (12.52) vs SCBFF (9.82). SCBFF YTD gains are higher at: 41.297 vs. NAUBF (6.560). SCBFF has less debt than NAUBF: SCBFF (93.9B) vs NAUBF (139B). NAUBF has higher revenues than SCBFF: NAUBF (19.9B) vs SCBFF (17.1B).
NAUBFSCBFFNAUBF / SCBFF
Capitalization59.6B26.8B222%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.56041.29716%
P/E Ratio12.529.82127%
Revenue19.9B17.1B116%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt139B93.9B148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NAUBF vs SCBFF: Fundamental Ratings
NAUBF
SCBFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3312
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4338
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5317
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
11n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCBFF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAUBF (91). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (33). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

NAUBF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SCBFF (6). This means that NAUBF’s stock grew similarly to SCBFF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NAUBF (43). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew similarly to NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCBFF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAUBF (53). This means that SCBFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAUBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NAUBFSCBFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NAUBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
POAI0.850.02
+1.89%
Predictive Oncology
CRNX29.800.36
+1.22%
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals
GSBC62.510.64
+1.03%
Great Southern Bancorp
ECBK16.010.16
+1.01%
ECB Bancorp
HOOD94.40-3.58
-3.65%
Robinhood Markets

NAUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUBF and FANDF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUBF and FANDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUBF
1D Price
Change %
NAUBF100%
-5.65%
FANDF - NAUBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBFJF - NAUBF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCBFF - NAUBF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
IDCBY - NAUBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
INGVF - NAUBF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCBFF has been loosely correlated with SCBFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCBFF jumps, then SCBFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBFF
1D Price
Change %
SCBFF100%
+1.50%
SCBFY - SCBFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
AAVMY - SCBFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
NABZY - SCBFF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
IDCBY - SCBFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
NAUBF - SCBFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
More