Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBDS vs SMH
NBDS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts NBDS vs SMH
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Price$34.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.26K
Net Assets27.05M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$295.65
Change-$6.27 (-2.08%)
Volume$9.03M
Net Assets27.74B
NBDS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBDS vs. SMH commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBDS is a StrongBuy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.7B vs. NBDS (27.1M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than NBDS: SMH (22.084) vs NBDS (16.711). NBDS was incepted earlier than SMH: NBDS (3 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than NBDS (0.55). NBDS has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| NBDS | SMH | NBDS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 16.711 | 22.084 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 27.1M | 27.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.35 | 157% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 15.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NBDS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RFDI | 76.14 | 0.31 | +0.41% |
| First Trust RiverFront Dyn Dev Intl ETF | |||
| USMC | 64.98 | 0.16 | +0.25% |
| Principal US Mega-Cap ETF | |||
| PSCD | 110.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Cnsmr Discret ETF | |||
| NMAI | 12.67 | -0.02 | -0.16% |
| Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund | |||
| QQQH | 53.78 | -0.15 | -0.28% |
| NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hdg Eq Inc ETF | |||
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBDS has been loosely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NBDS jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| HOOD - NBDS | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| ARM - NBDS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| AVGO - NBDS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| NVMI - NBDS | 62% Loosely correlated | -6.08% | ||
| HUBS - NBDS | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -2.08% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -7.33% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -8.42% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -14.07% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||