Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBDS vs SMH
NBDS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts NBDS vs SMH
NBDS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+55%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBDS vs. SMH commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBDS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 67B vs. NBDS (143M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than NBDS: SMH (69.669) vs NBDS (9.513). NBDS was incepted earlier than SMH: NBDS (4 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than NBDS (0.40). NBDS has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| NBDS | SMH | NBDS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 9.513 | 69.669 | 14% |
| Net Assets | 143M | 67B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 12.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.17 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NBDS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+55%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
NBDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBDS and ONTO have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBDS and ONTO's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBDS | 100% | -2.08% | ||
| ONTO - NBDS | 17% Poorly correlated | -6.40% | ||
| GTM - NBDS | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.39% | ||
| ARM - NBDS | 10% Poorly correlated | -8.14% | ||
| TDG - NBDS | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
| RDDT - NBDS | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -4.56% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -4.72% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -2.93% | ||
More | ||||