Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGAX vs WCMLX
NBGAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGAX vs WCMLX
NBGAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGAX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. WCMLX (51.9M). NBGAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBGAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGAX (29 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGAX (1.34). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGAX (23.00). NBGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBGAX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. NBGAX (-2.27). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.16 vs. NBGAX (-22.08).
| NBGAX | WCMLX | NBGAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.99 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.79 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.076 | 11.410 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 51.9M | 14,237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.27 | 17.02 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.57 | 32.50 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.08 | 3.16 | -698% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers