Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGAX vs WCMLX
NBGAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGAX vs WCMLX
NBGAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGAX has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). NBGAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBGAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGAX (29 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGAX (1.34). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGAX (23.00). NBGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBGAX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. NBGAX (-9.11). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. NBGAX (-26.11).
| NBGAX | WCMLX | NBGAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.99 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.79 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.948 | 3.852 | 284% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.95B | 47.2M | 14,733% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.11 | 2.81 | -325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.24 | 23.40 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.11 | -7.51 | 348% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement