Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGEX vs WCMLX
NBGEX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGEX vs WCMLX
NBGEX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGEX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGEX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGEX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). NBGEX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NBGEX (0.09) vs WCMLX (0.00). NBGEX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGEX (33 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGEX (1.09). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGEX (23.00). NBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBGEX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. NBGEX (-5.96). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. NBGEX (-24.29).
| NBGEX | WCMLX | NBGEX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.99 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.79 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.475 | 9.375 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 52.4M | 13,977% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.96 | 25.84 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.49 | 32.13 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.29 | -0.07 | 36,578% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement