Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGEX vs WCMLX
NBGEX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGEX vs WCMLX
NBGEX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGEX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGEX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGEX has more cash in the bank: 7.14B vs. WCMLX (49.8M). NBGEX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NBGEX (0.08) vs WCMLX (0.00). NBGEX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGEX (33 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGEX (1.09). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGEX (23.00). NBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBGEX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. NBGEX (-4.71). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.19 vs. NBGEX (-24.65).
| NBGEX | WCMLX | NBGEX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.99 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.79 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.589 | 6.904 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.14B | 49.8M | 14,343% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.71 | 10.02 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.35 | 22.79 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.65 | -7.19 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement