Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGIX vs WCMLX
NBGIX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGIX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Instl
Price$65.42
Change-$0.19 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.3B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
NBGIX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGIX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGIX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGIX has more cash in the bank: 9.3B vs. WCMLX (44.8M). NBGIX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBGIX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGIX (26 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGIX (0.84). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NBGIX (13.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBGIX: WCMLX (100000) vs NBGIX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.77 vs. NBGIX (-1.96). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.13 vs. NBGIX (4.30).
| NBGIX | WCMLX | NBGIX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.99 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.336 | 5.832 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.3B | 44.8M | 20,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.96 | 4.77 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.32 | 22.83 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.30 | 17.13 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.98 | N/A | - |