Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGIX vs WCMLX
NBGIX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGIX vs WCMLX
NBGIX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGIX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGIX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGIX has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). NBGIX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NBGIX (0.30) vs WCMLX (0.00). NBGIX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGIX (27 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGIX (0.84). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGIX (23.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBGIX: WCMLX (100000) vs NBGIX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. NBGIX (-8.19). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. NBGIX (-23.50).
| NBGIX | WCMLX | NBGIX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.99 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.334 | 3.852 | 294% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.95B | 47.2M | 14,733% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.19 | 2.81 | -292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.42 | 23.40 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.50 | -7.51 | 313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers