Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGIX vs WCMLX
NBGIX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGIX vs WCMLX
NBGIX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGIX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGIX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGIX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). NBGIX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NBGIX (0.32) vs WCMLX (0.00). NBGIX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGIX (27 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGIX (0.84). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGIX (23.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBGIX: WCMLX (100000) vs NBGIX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. NBGIX (-5.59). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. NBGIX (-23.15).
| NBGIX | WCMLX | NBGIX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.99 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.79 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.577 | 9.375 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 52.4M | 13,977% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.59 | 25.84 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.59 | 32.13 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.15 | -0.07 | 34,870% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement