Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGNX vs WCMLX
NBGNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGNX vs WCMLX
NBGNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGNX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGNX has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). NBGNX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NBGNX (0.20) vs WCMLX (0.00). NBGNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGNX (38 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGNX (0.99). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGNX (23.00). NBGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBGNX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. NBGNX (-8.38). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. NBGNX (-24.14).
| NBGNX | WCMLX | NBGNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.79 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.219 | 3.852 | 291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.95B | 47.2M | 14,733% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.38 | 2.81 | -298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.87 | 23.40 | 8% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.14 | -7.51 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement