Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGNX vs WCMLX
NBGNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGNX vs WCMLX
NBGNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGNX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGNX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. WCMLX (54.5M). NBGNX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NBGNX (0.22) vs WCMLX (0.00). NBGNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGNX (38 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGNX (0.99). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGNX (23.00). NBGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBGNX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.70 vs. NBGNX (-1.87). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -1.88 vs. NBGNX (-20.59).
| NBGNX | WCMLX | NBGNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.79 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.936 | 13.590 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.54B | 54.5M | 13,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.87 | 27.70 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.50 | 35.91 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.59 | -1.88 | 1,093% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement