Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBGNX vs WCMLX
NBGNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBGNX vs WCMLX
NBGNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBGNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBGNX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBGNX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. WCMLX (53.1M). NBGNX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NBGNX (0.22) vs WCMLX (0.00). NBGNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBGNX (38 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBGNX (0.99). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NBGNX (23.00). NBGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NBGNX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. NBGNX (-5.81). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.33 vs. NBGNX (-23.82).
| NBGNX | WCMLX | NBGNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.79 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.496 | 10.683 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 53.1M | 13,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.81 | 25.56 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.14 | 33.71 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.82 | 0.33 | -7,233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement