Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHAX vs RMEBX
NBHAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NBHAX vs RMEBX
NBHAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NBHAX (1.03B). NBHAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NBHAX (1.53) vs RMEBX (0.99). NBHAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NBHAX (18 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). NBHAX (1.09) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . NBHAX (31.00) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHAX: RMEBX (250) vs NBHAX (1000). NBHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. NBHAX (19.86).
| NBHAX | RMEBX | NBHAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.277 | 9.416 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.99 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 8.96 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.79 | 32.63 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.86 | 36.13 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.48 | 90.64 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers