Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBHAX vs RMEBX
NBHAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NBHAX vs RMEBX
NBHAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBHAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBHAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NBHAX (1.02B). NBHAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NBHAX (1.54) vs RMEBX (1.04). NBHAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NBHAX (18 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). NBHAX (1.09) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . NBHAX (31.00) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBHAX: RMEBX (250) vs NBHAX (1000). NBHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.66 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. NBHAX (19.44).
| NBHAX | RMEBX | NBHAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.07 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.444 | 6.308 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.04 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.66 | 9.11 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.35 | 34.37 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.44 | 34.74 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.75 | 94.33 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement