Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBIAX vs RLBCX
NBIAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts NBIAX vs RLBCX
Columbia Capital Alloc Mod Agrsv A
Price$12.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.78B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.28
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
NBIAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBIAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBIAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. NBIAX (1.78B). NBIAX (1.56) and RLBCX (1.53) have matching dividends . NBIAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: NBIAX (29 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). NBIAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NBIAX (8.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBIAX: RLBCX (250) vs NBIAX (2000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. NBIAX (7.09). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.14 vs. NBIAX (17.37).
| NBIAX | RLBCX | NBIAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.163 | 12.747 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.53 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.09 | 9.03 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.05 | 41.73 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.37 | 41.14 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.98 | 75.56 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement